![[info]](http://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small}
- 11:51 Take Action @change: Petition for transparency in the vote counting process bit.ly/5UX4lD #
- 21:26 @samskivert you are conceding that you'll pay $5 for sugar water. #
- 09:19 Can I get a firefox plugin that replaces "loose" with "lose", always? The error rate would go down. #
- 09:19 Fox News: we distort, you abide. #
- 09:07 What would you do with a million minutes? #
- 14:42 I'm changing my name to Coolio Boitano. #
Yes yes yes. Apple got it right with snow leopard. A gigabyte is 10^9 bytes. Using base 2 was the approximation: 1024 isn't a kilo. 1000 is. It's time to correct the mistake. (And now your computer thinks the hard drive is as big as you thought it was when you bought it.) Why do so many smart people think this was the wrong move?
- 09:55 Thinking about buying a minivan. Something like the VW Routan, Kia Sedona, or Toyota Sienna. Doing so may speed the onset of gray pubes. #
- 13:41 My first Apple was a 2GS, but now I have a 3GS. #
- 05:35 Back in the USA. #
- 20:32 @ciaweth bit.ly/xPSFX #
You gotta love my crazy ideas. The things that I post are so random. Sometimes I have a funny story or a strange position on some current event and I think about the post while I'm out and about. I end up thinking about it for so long while away from the computer that I never can muster the will to type it in all the greatness that it has become in my head. The only posts I ever do do are those that I dash out with no forethought.
Anyway, no songs of the week lately, but something that's been in the rotation for months now is Soul Wax, particularly their album "Nite Visions", and especially Compute and NY Lipps. Great working music.
Dang, do I still play AOM? What is it about RTSs? And while I'm at it, what about my home computer worsens up my RSIs?
Anyway, no songs of the week lately, but something that's been in the rotation for months now is Soul Wax, particularly their album "Nite Visions", and especially Compute and NY Lipps. Great working music.
Dang, do I still play AOM? What is it about RTSs? And while I'm at it, what about my home computer worsens up my RSIs?
EPA cleanup instructions for mercury spills: read it.
PG&E has been giving away CFLs, but I wonder how many people know how to dispose of them? They have a link on the top of their CFL promotional page: http://www.pge-cfl.com/
So.. I remember when I was young, one time my mom broke a thermometer by accident. She called me over and we caught the mercury in some paper and then into my hand. I played with it for a while, dumping it back and forth and fingering it with my other hand, eventually dropping it into the carpet below us.
PG&E has been giving away CFLs, but I wonder how many people know how to dispose of them? They have a link on the top of their CFL promotional page: http://www.pge-cfl.com/
So.. I remember when I was young, one time my mom broke a thermometer by accident. She called me over and we caught the mercury in some paper and then into my hand. I played with it for a while, dumping it back and forth and fingering it with my other hand, eventually dropping it into the carpet below us.
It just burns me up that this is even up for debate. I sent the following letter this morning. I have been a supporter of the Open Voting Consortium and urge you, dear reader, to make a donation today.
To : <SF Board of supervisors>
Cc : <Mayor Gavin Newsom>
Subject : Voting machines: There's nothing PROPRIETARY about COUNTING.
----- Message Text -----
You start at 1... then you go to 2.. on to 3...
Or at least, that's how we hope it works.
But software is tricky business. I should know, I've been a software
developer for most of my life after getting hooked when I was 12 years
old. Even if one's code is very straightforward, there's always the
possibility of bugs or other unexpected behavior. The best solution to
this is peer review.
Voting machine companies that claim that their source is full of
proprietary secrets are scared. They're scared that their software can't
stand on its own merits, or more sinisterly, that we'll find something we
won't like. Even if they're being honest now, we can't give them a free
pass for the future: software can be changed and updated at the blink of
an eye. If we don't know how the machines work, how would we know when
they've made a change under the hood?
Imagine if we were seeking vote-counting services from companies that used
Oompa-Loompas to do the counting. Open source voting is analogous to a
company allowing observers to watch the Oompa-Loompas load the votes
into big plastic bins. The bins are loaded into vans and the observers
ride along too, so that they can watch what happens to the bins inside the
vans. The Oompa-Loompas drive to the central warehouse and start counting
all the votes, with the observers carefully watching every step.
Or: we can use the company that picks up the bins in secret, drives them
to an undisclosed location and simply announces the results. Even if we
are allowed one ride-along, there's nothing to stop them from changing
their procedure in the future.
Software is merely instructions for a computer. There's nothing
proprietary about counting! We have to take a stand, and say: If you want
us to use your software then, so sorry, you'll have to let us see how it
works. That's the business you've chosen, and that's the way it's going to
have to be!
Please do whatever you can to improve the transparency and security of our
voting systems, whether choosing to have software count the votes, or
Oompa-Loompas.
Thanks for listening,
Ray Greenwell
To : <SF Board of supervisors>
Cc : <Mayor Gavin Newsom>
Subject : Voting machines: There's nothing PROPRIETARY about COUNTING.
----- Message Text -----
You start at 1... then you go to 2.. on to 3...
Or at least, that's how we hope it works.
But software is tricky business. I should know, I've been a software
developer for most of my life after getting hooked when I was 12 years
old. Even if one's code is very straightforward, there's always the
possibility of bugs or other unexpected behavior. The best solution to
this is peer review.
Voting machine companies that claim that their source is full of
proprietary secrets are scared. They're scared that their software can't
stand on its own merits, or more sinisterly, that we'll find something we
won't like. Even if they're being honest now, we can't give them a free
pass for the future: software can be changed and updated at the blink of
an eye. If we don't know how the machines work, how would we know when
they've made a change under the hood?
Imagine if we were seeking vote-counting services from companies that used
Oompa-Loompas to do the counting. Open source voting is analogous to a
company allowing observers to watch the Oompa-Loompas load the votes
into big plastic bins. The bins are loaded into vans and the observers
ride along too, so that they can watch what happens to the bins inside the
vans. The Oompa-Loompas drive to the central warehouse and start counting
all the votes, with the observers carefully watching every step.
Or: we can use the company that picks up the bins in secret, drives them
to an undisclosed location and simply announces the results. Even if we
are allowed one ride-along, there's nothing to stop them from changing
their procedure in the future.
Software is merely instructions for a computer. There's nothing
proprietary about counting! We have to take a stand, and say: If you want
us to use your software then, so sorry, you'll have to let us see how it
works. That's the business you've chosen, and that's the way it's going to
have to be!
Please do whatever you can to improve the transparency and security of our
voting systems, whether choosing to have software count the votes, or
Oompa-Loompas.
Thanks for listening,
Ray Greenwell
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n
Why can't both theories be right? I've been wondering this for a while, but this article doesn't even bring up the possibility. I mean, if a giant asteroid hits the planet, is too much to assume that it will deform the crust and place pressure on the mantle and possibly cause a spike in volcanic activity? India is pretty much on the other side of the planet from the Yucatan.
Why can't both theories be right? I've been wondering this for a while, but this article doesn't even bring up the possibility. I mean, if a giant asteroid hits the planet, is too much to assume that it will deform the crust and place pressure on the mantle and possibly cause a spike in volcanic activity? India is pretty much on the other side of the planet from the Yucatan.
- I am getting a Mac Mini. I'm excited, and will try to use it as my primary email/browser machine and see if I can get to like it for software development.
- My sidekick's network actually seems faster now. Maybe it's just a network upgrade in my area, maybe T-Mobile has a certain bandwidth allocation and there's more for me now that people are jumping ship for iphone. That's unlikely, actually.
- I'm still holding off on an iphone. It needs instant messenging and ssh before I'll be ready, and yes: I know you can get those now if you hack the phone, but I don't want to have to hack anything. Besides, I think I've got 8 months left on my T-Mobile contract.
- Bravo to Amazon and the other legit mp3 stores popping up. I may actually move away from my current music acquisition model, which is to subscribe to rhapsody and strip off the DRM on files I download. Yes, I know: I'm screwing their play count tracking and potentially screwing artists out of revenue, but removing the DRM made everything better: the files are smaller (so more fit on my fauxpod), they start playing faster, and I don't have to synch every 2 weeks to update the licenses. Having the files in mp3 format would be a bigger win, but I still love rhapsody's feature of letting me listen to any song all the way through. I simply don't have the time or skill to listen to 30-second clips and decide if I want an album. Let's say there's a song I like by an artist I never heard of. On most music stores you can listen to a bunch of clips of their other songs and try to figure out if you should get the whole album or just the song. Well, on rhapsody I just download the album, throw it into my 'evaluate' playlist, and can decide at my leisure if it's good or if I want to delete it.
- Zelda for the DS has wonderful controls.
- My sidekick's network actually seems faster now. Maybe it's just a network upgrade in my area, maybe T-Mobile has a certain bandwidth allocation and there's more for me now that people are jumping ship for iphone. That's unlikely, actually.
- I'm still holding off on an iphone. It needs instant messenging and ssh before I'll be ready, and yes: I know you can get those now if you hack the phone, but I don't want to have to hack anything. Besides, I think I've got 8 months left on my T-Mobile contract.
- Bravo to Amazon and the other legit mp3 stores popping up. I may actually move away from my current music acquisition model, which is to subscribe to rhapsody and strip off the DRM on files I download. Yes, I know: I'm screwing their play count tracking and potentially screwing artists out of revenue, but removing the DRM made everything better: the files are smaller (so more fit on my fauxpod), they start playing faster, and I don't have to synch every 2 weeks to update the licenses. Having the files in mp3 format would be a bigger win, but I still love rhapsody's feature of letting me listen to any song all the way through. I simply don't have the time or skill to listen to 30-second clips and decide if I want an album. Let's say there's a song I like by an artist I never heard of. On most music stores you can listen to a bunch of clips of their other songs and try to figure out if you should get the whole album or just the song. Well, on rhapsody I just download the album, throw it into my 'evaluate' playlist, and can decide at my leisure if it's good or if I want to delete it.
- Zelda for the DS has wonderful controls.
I bought a book that I ended up hating. I wish I could undo the money I sent the author's way, as well as discourage this book from being in circulation. What is more effective?
- throw the book away, removing a copy from circulation.
OR
- sell it to a used book store, recouping some of my money and potentially depriving the author of future profit if someone seeking the book buys it used.
- throw the book away, removing a copy from circulation.
OR
- sell it to a used book store, recouping some of my money and potentially depriving the author of future profit if someone seeking the book buys it used.
I'm planning on sticking with my sidekick 3 for the time being. That I can just throw that out there with no context speaks a lot about iPhone mania.
So T-mobile doesn't even have their own network, at least not around where I live. I'm actually on AT&T's network, the very same EDGE network that all these iphones are shortly going to be clogging. I'm curious to see if I notice an impact on data performance.
So T-mobile doesn't even have their own network, at least not around where I live. I'm actually on AT&T's network, the very same EDGE network that all these iphones are shortly going to be clogging. I'm curious to see if I notice an impact on data performance.
Yeah, it looks pretty funny.
But, this is a *comedy* about God deciding that every human, except Evan and his family, needs to die? They seem to gloss over that in the previews.
But, this is a *comedy* about God deciding that every human, except Evan and his family, needs to die? They seem to gloss over that in the previews.